🔗 Share this article

While the struggling Tories meets in its conference city for its annual party conference, it has much to ponder regarding its next steps. It’s not even clear if a clear direction is available. These are difficult days for a political party that now has little, if anything, new or unique to say to the electorate.

The Missed Opportunity

The situation might have been markedly improved if concrete steps had been made on an agenda that resonates with people nationwide: Social mobility. But Boris Johnson’s government did not possess the basic understanding on how to turn his zeitgeisty rhetoric on social mobility into concrete action. For the two years after the general election, it debated what the phrase even meant.

I found it bizarre, because I’d already told the Prime Minister what levelling up meant when we originally talked about it during his leadership campaign. The phrase was a term I developed and used at the DfE to talk about equal opportunity. This became our guiding principle, and its purpose is clear: levelling up is the approach by which we attain fair chances – not through reducing opportunity away from those who already have it, but rather by extending chances to those that are without.

Essential Principle

The other key ministry expression we used, “talent is spread evenly throughout the nation, however access isn’t”, again was a intentional wording, representing the dual components of a fairness agenda. First, potential shared equally but not developed consistently through our education system. Additionally, access not provided uniformly by the private sector or our economy. Therefore, learning and employment were key to achieving improved equality of opportunity. This represented an priority about the societal structure of our country – supporting people’s potential and linking them with prospects.

What Levelling Up Became

How did the social mobility agenda turn into under the previous government? Regional development money administered out of the DLUHC. Street beautification and rearranged intersections. A government strategy was released nearly three years after Johnson became leader, which saw current strategies repackaged under the recently branded agenda.

As a result, a comprehensive equal opportunity plan went ignored, as well as all the change that it may have generated – in funding, business, economic policy, tax and in local regeneration. Moreover, in schooling, including a university system that has become a punchbag for elected officials – although it remains the strongest driver of social mobility for young working-class people, personally, this country has had in recent decades. Possibly the only engine of social mobility, functioning widely.

The Role of Ambition

Ambition is essential for our country to thrive. For hope to exist, there needs to be a believable feeling that hard work and results are related; that if people aspire, they can succeed. For any government, being able to foster a feeling of hope about the future is important. Analysis by the research body at the university and others, recently released, showed that the education department’s targeted regions I launched while in office – community-focused methods to improving education outcomes – led to youth in those areas being up to 18 percentage points more optimistic about their future than those in similar areas without these initiatives in place. The evidence is clear: just making an sincere effort on equal chance initiatives can swiftly and beneficially change how people view their destiny.

Squandered Chances

Ignoring this evidence, and in the midst of its new leader election, in September 2022, the Conservative government ended the initiatives. Why should any person in those areas vote for a organization that took that action? The targeted programme is a single instance of what could have been a transformative Tory policy platform on levelling up, but that possibility was hopelessly squandered. Methods such as this can create belief and drive. On the other hand, as the Conservatives learned, failing to deliver of social mobility is the most expensive error any political party can make. Voters held accountable the administration for its failure but, above all, for its unfulfilled commitments on social mobility.

Present Circumstances

Currently the baton on social mobility and equality of opportunity has passed to a opposition party. The levelling up rhetoric has been discarded. The new government has its own policy language of “breaking down the barriers to opportunity”. The organization that is steadily supplanting the failing incumbents, Reform UK, also has its own terminology – “economic renewal”. This expression to talk about new opportunities in communities like the one I come from, in the region. It promises that an industrial past can be reborn into an modern manufacturing sector.

For the public, it must appear as a repetitive cycle. Similar challenge, different language. However, so far, no progress.

What Must Change

If Labour and Reform UK want to escape the similar destiny, both these parties should take lessons from the Tories’ mistakes on social mobility; that equal opportunity talk is simple terminology, but successful delivery of more equal results is much harder. Britain’s chronically poor social mobility remains the key issue for our country, with youth unable to get a proper professional launch, those putting in effort in occupations with little to show after the rent has been paid, and individuals nationwide without any actual expectation their children will be able to do improve in life than they have.

Politicians can discuss improved access repeatedly. But where is the organization that has the complete plan on life chances? I see none. Whoever gets there first, wins. Not just for themselves, but, significantly, for a entire nation that has never needed equal access so badly.