🔗 Share this article

A ruling on whether to sanction Beijing's application for a fresh super-embassy in London has been deferred once more by the government.

Housing Secretary Steve Reed had been expected to determine on the request by 21 October, but the cut-off date has been pushed back to 10 December.

It is the second occasion the administration has deferred a decision on the contentious site, whose location has generated apprehensions it could pose an spying threat.

A determination had first been expected by 9 September after cabinet members gained oversight of the procedure from Tower Hamlets, the regional government, last year.

Safety Worries Brought Up

China purchased the location of the proposed fresh embassy, at Royal Mint Court, adjacent to the Tower of London, for £255m in 2018. At 20,000 square metres, the planned facility would be the most substantial embassy in Europe assuming approval.

The pending ruling on whether to approve the recent embassy was already under intense examination because of apprehensions about the safety consequences of the scheme, including the location, size and design of the building.

The location is close to fibre optic cables carrying messages to and from financial institutions in the City of London. Worries have been raised that Beijing agents could utilize the location to access the cables and listen in.

Latest Changes

Additional inquiries have been highlighted in the last several weeks about the character of the danger created by Beijing, following the collapse of the legal proceeding against two men charged of espionage for China.

The Crown Prosecution Service unexpectedly discontinued prosecutions against government studies analyst Christopher Cash, 30, and scholar Christopher Berry, 33, last month. Both men refute the accusations.

Previous Delays

The administration's first delay was requested by Reed's predecessor Angela Rayner, after she requested China to explain why particular spaces within its development papers had been redacted for "safety concerns".

Architectural specialists working for the China consulate had responded that China "does not believe that, as a matter of principle, it is necessary or fitting to provide full internal layout plans".

Rayner had sent correspondence to organizations participating in the consultation, including China, the Metropolitan Police and a neighborhood group, to give them more time to answer to the plans and putting the deadline back to 21 October.

Present Circumstances

Reed, who assumed the residential portfolio following Rayner's departure last month, has now asked for more time before a conclusive determination must be reached.

In a correspondence examined by media outlets, the accommodation ministry said additional time was needed due to the "detailed nature" of responses received so far.

It added that it was not able to determine another time limit for additional feedback until it receives awaiting answers from the International Relations Department and Domestic Affairs Department.

Proposed Facilities

The planned facility would incorporate administrative areas, a substantial underground space, residences for 200 staff, and a recent underground connection to join the Embassy House to a independent facility on the embassy grounds.

Government Responses

Beijing's application for the embassy was first refused by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022 over security and protection worries.

It submitted again an same request to the municipal government in August 2024, one month after the administration changed.

The China Consulate in the UK has earlier stated the new complex would improve "shared productive collaboration" between China and Britain.

In a new diplomatic note issued accompanying Reed's correspondence clarifying his causes for the latest delay, a Chinese official said objections to the site were "either baseless or unwarranted".

Critical Perspectives

The Opposition Party said Administration members should reject the proposal, and accused them of trying to "muffle the warnings about the dangers to country protection" presented by the consulate location.

The Alternative Group also called for the application to be blocked, urging the administration to "resist China".

Diplomatic Affairs commentator Calum Miller said it would be "irrational" for cabinet members to allow the diplomatic project to move forward, after warnings from the director of MI5 on Thursday about the danger of Beijing spying.

Intelligence Concerns

A previous senior consultant to Boris Johnson said MI5 and MI6 had cautions him China was "trying to build a spy centre underneath the embassy," when he was working at Downing Street.

Commenting during a political podcast, the consultant said the agencies had advised him that authorizing the embassy to be erected would be "a highly unwise choice".

In his annual speech, the protection head said "China national operatives" presented a country protection risk to the UK "daily".

He mentioned that the UK required to "defend itself resolutely" against China, while also being able to "capitalize on the chances" from sustaining ties with Beijing.