🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are watching closely to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

European Trend

In Europe, a increasing number of countries are moving toward comparable measures.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our children's childhood". The policy could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban could be "a potential tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to pass a proposal increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a related move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a advisory motion demanding a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a solid first step," stated the European lawmaker supporting the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the government has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "based on strong research".

Previously, support gathered behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after encountering harmful social media material argues that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to create products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," said a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, regulation is largely occurring at the regional level due to federal inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a law banning under-14s from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with extra use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced laws demanding adult authorization for minors to create social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from various individuals to follow this path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Outside of Europe and the US, other nations are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, international agencies adopt a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate evolves, the policies of the Australian government and others indicate that states globally are less and less prepared to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.