🔗 Share this article

Throughout the opening pages of the publication Authentic, writer the author poses a challenge: commonplace directives to “come as you are” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are not harmless encouragements for personal expression – they can be pitfalls. Her first book – a mix of personal stories, research, cultural commentary and interviews – aims to reveal how organizations co-opt identity, transferring the weight of organizational transformation on to staff members who are already vulnerable.

Personal Journey and Larger Setting

The motivation for the book stems partly in Burey’s personal work history: various roles across business retail, new companies and in worldwide progress, filtered through her perspective as a woman of color with a disability. The two-fold position that the author encounters – a back-and-forth between expressing one’s identity and looking for safety – is the engine of her work.

It arrives at a time of widespread exhaustion with institutional platitudes across America and other regions, as opposition to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs increase, and numerous companies are cutting back the very systems that earlier assured change and reform. Burey delves into that landscape to argue that withdrawing from corporate authenticity talk – namely, the organizational speech that reduces individuality as a collection of appearances, quirks and hobbies, keeping workers focused on controlling how they are viewed rather than how they are handled – is not a solution; instead, we need to redefine it on our individual conditions.

Minority Staff and the Display of Persona

By means of vivid anecdotes and interviews, the author demonstrates how marginalized workers – employees from diverse backgrounds, members of the LGBTQ+ community, female employees, people with disabilities – learn early on to adjust which self will “be acceptable”. A weakness becomes a disadvantage and people try too hard by striving to seem palatable. The effort of “showing your complete identity” becomes a projection screen on which all manner of expectations are cast: affective duties, disclosure and continuous act of thankfulness. In Burey’s words, we are asked to share our identities – but absent the safeguards or the confidence to survive what arises.

As Burey explains, we are asked to share our identities – but absent the safeguards or the reliance to endure what arises.’

Real-Life Example: The Story of Jason

The author shows this dynamic through the narrative of Jason, a employee with hearing loss who chose to educate his co-workers about the culture of the deaf community and interaction standards. His eagerness to discuss his background – a behavior of openness the organization often applauds as “genuineness” – temporarily made everyday communications easier. But as Burey shows, that advancement was precarious. When employee changes erased the informal knowledge Jason had built, the atmosphere of inclusion vanished. “Everything he taught went away with the staff,” he notes wearily. What was left was the weariness of needing to begin again, of being held accountable for an company’s developmental journey. According to Burey, this demonstrates to be requested to expose oneself absent defenses: to face exposure in a framework that praises your openness but refuses to institutionalize it into policy. Sincerity becomes a pitfall when companies count on personal sharing rather than institutional answerability.

Literary Method and Notion of Opposition

The author’s prose is simultaneously understandable and poetic. She combines intellectual rigor with a manner of connection: an offer for readers to lean in, to interrogate, to dissent. In Burey’s opinion, professional resistance is not overt defiance but principled refusal – the effort of rejecting sameness in workplaces that require gratitude for simple belonging. To oppose, in her framing, is to interrogate the narratives institutions describe about justice and inclusion, and to refuse involvement in rituals that perpetuate unfairness. It may appear as naming bias in a gathering, opting out of uncompensated “diversity” labor, or establishing limits around how much of one’s personal life is provided to the company. Opposition, the author proposes, is an affirmation of personal dignity in spaces that typically praise compliance. It is a discipline of principle rather than rebellion, a method of asserting that an individual’s worth is not conditional on corporate endorsement.

Restoring Sincerity

The author also avoids rigid dichotomies. Authentic does not simply toss out “authenticity” completely: on the contrary, she urges its redefinition. In Burey’s view, genuineness is not simply the unrestricted expression of individuality that corporate culture often celebrates, but a more deliberate harmony between individual principles and one’s actions – an integrity that rejects distortion by organizational requirements. As opposed to treating sincerity as a requirement to reveal too much or adapt to sterilized models of transparency, the author encourages readers to maintain the elements of it rooted in sincerity, personal insight and principled vision. According to Burey, the objective is not to abandon genuineness but to shift it – to move it out of the corporate display practices and toward relationships and organizations where trust, fairness and responsibility make {